Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on email

The Power of Acceptance

The Way You Do Equity Is You Accept Everything From Any Public Actor, Officer, Or Agent.

The one power inherent in every commercial
presentment is our unlimited Power to Accept.

If you accept it, you don’t go into controversy.
But you don’t “accept it for value”.
That’s a commercial aberration.

This is why the D’Vida documents, the Mandate and Writs, and instructions are created the way they are.

Here is a point-by-point explanation of how it works:

  1. If somebody comes to your door and says, “I’m here from the Health Department. You are required to take this injection . . . ”,
  2.  
  3. You say: “Great! I’m happy you are here.” With this attitude, you are not going into controversy and it defuses the entire situation.
  4.  
  5. You don’t argue. (Everybody thinks they need to argue and that’s where one enters a field of battle. The system is set up so that we lose every time in a field of battle because we go into dishonor, we dishonor the presentment. If you look at the rules of the UCC, you can only do 2 things: You can honor a presentment or you can dishonor it).
  6.  
  7. You don’t reject, you simply give them a condition, a precedent to your accepting the mandatory requirement.
  8.  
  9. What we tell people on the website and in the instructions is if someone comes to your door and says “it’s mandatory, you have to do it”, you say:
  10.  
  11. “Oh thank you for showing up. I appreciate it but I do not do any commercial business in person, only via the mail. I require your written authority with your wet ink signature and your supervisor’s wet ink signature sent to me in the mail.” If they say it is not a commercial business, you say “I am not here to argue the law with you. Are you qualified to make legal decisions here?” Of course they are not and will have to say so.
  12.  
  13. When it’s sent in the mail it’s under Federal jurisdiction. In the United States, if it’s a fraudulent instrument, the United States will deal with it on their own terms as mail fraud. In other countries it would be good to research to find similar basis for federal jurisdiction over anything that is sent through the mail.
  14.  
  15. Everything we do in the private aligns or conforms with the phrase “Let the Dead tend to the Dead.” Any item they send to you is a public document and a commercial instrument. It is from the realm of the dead. When we accept it and return it, we are sending their dead instrument back to them to settle.
  16.  
  17. So we let the Dead tend to the Dead, we let them settle their controversies, let them settle their claims, liabilities and so forth.
  18.  
  19. We stay in the private. We honor what they give us and we say to them, “We simply require it to come in a written form with your wet ink signature and that of your supervisor verifying your full legal and lawful authority to do what you say is mandatory.”
  20.  
  21. You don’t threaten. You only give honor and that requires them to return honor.
  22.  
  23. That is what is meant by “Going To Peace.” The power of going to peace is manifold beyond anything in the field of battle. They have to go back, put their wet ink signature on a written statement, and by so doing they’ve already put their liability on there – you don’t have to notice them of it. Sending Notices of Liability in any form is actually considered a threat and puts one in the position of being seen as a belligerent and enemy combatant. Doing what we do keeps us at peace in the public and neutral with all parties, thus not giving any manner of way to attack us.
  24.  
  25. If somebody comes to your door and you say, “Great, send me this, signed by you and your supervisor, please send it to this address, and the address is: Kingdom of David, Attention John Henry Doe, c/o 1234 Main Street, Sometown, Anystate…
  26.  
  27. They’re sending it to the Kingdom of David. You’re acting under the umbrella and sanctuary of the Kingdom of David.
  28.  
  29. What you do is you accept it, follow the instructions in your D’Vida Welcome Pack. Write in the upper right corner of the document “ACCEPTED” (with quotation marks), the date and your signature.
  30. You have actually accepted the embedded equity that underwrites the issue of that charged instrument that creates a debt. Even if you don’t think a mandate order to do something medically is neither commercial nor creates a debt, they do in fact do exactly that. When they do the injections they actually create a bond or multiple bonds, underwritten by your underlying estate, and they make a lot of money on the trading of these bonds. So, when they say  that is entirely not true. They are bonding us to further debt much more than the simple cost of the stuff shot into your arm.
  31.  
  32. When they have this mandate, they’re creating a charged instrument with the franchise name that compels you as the surety to step up under public policy and perform the mandatory requirement AKA, take the jab.
  33.  
  34. It is a charge just like any other charge. It has a monetary value. When you perform the duty, it becomes a discharge, which settles it. But the bonds underneath remain, and they are traded and generate a lot more than the charge on the surface.
  35.  
  36. There is equity there because the estate that underlies the franchise is providing the secured value and the collateralization of that debt instrument.
  37.  
  38. When you do full status correction, you have complete command and control of all of that. But it takes a serious commitment to fully correct one’s status.
  39.  
  40. What we are starting with our D’Vida members is that you can still have the power of acceptance even if you don’t have any status correction under your belt, because embedded in that instrument is equity. Intrinsic to any commercial instrument in the public is the Power to Accept. When you accept an instrument (document, presentment, bill, charge, order, mandate) you indicate that you have not abandoned the equity in the presentment.
  41.  
  42. When they present it in a written form with their signatures on it, it’s implicated that they’re standing under limited liability, plus they’re exceeding their bounds of duty or constraints of duty if there is no real authority that backs the mandate. They know (and we know) that that is the case. There is no authority behind these mandates.
  43.  
  44. When you accept it because it has your franchise name on it, you have taken control of the equity and you send it back to them.
  45.  
  46. When you send it back to them, it’s an implicit requirement that they must settle the account. If they settle the account, they stay within the bounds of their duty and there is no longer a charge or a means to apply the mandatory requirement on the US surety. If they do not do what is required, then they have exceeded the bounds of their authority and in this way, they have stepped out from behind the shield of limited liability that protects them only when they follow the law.
  47.  
  48. When you’re at the door with the man or woman who says, “You must do this”, say, “Fine, great, thank you for coming,” stay at peace.
  49.  
  50. “I would like you to present this in the form in which I do my commercial business.”
  51.  
  52. You can say it in different ways but that’s essentially what you are saying. You tell them to send it in writing, because that’s a commercial instrument because it has your franchise name on it, as the signature.
  53.  
  54. They are creating a bond which is a public form of monetary debt. It’s embedded with the equity.
  55.  
  56. They send it in the mail and when you’ve told them at the door, “Send it to me this way, and I will honor it to the full extent of the law”, they’re thinking “Oh, the full extent of the law, the law says you must mandatorily take the jab.” But that’s not the law. What is in the law is your power of acceptance and everything that has been written above. The key is “I will honor it”, because we always want to stay in honor with the public, in commerce.
  57.  
  58. So, you get this charged instrument and you accept it and return it to them.
  59.  
  60. That is an implied command that they must settle the charged instrument and zero it out by generally accepted economics principles of debits and credits.
  61.  
  62. Credit is on the private side even though you don’t have standing to claim it.
  63.  
  64. It is implied in the instrument that it is able to be accepted to discharge.
  65.  
  66. This is because the law says the power of acceptance is apparent in every instrument that it is able to be accepted to discharge.
  67.  
  68. The law says the power of acceptance is apparent in every instrument and in every presentment. Not “accepted for value” because that is turning it into a negotiable instrument and you don’t have the authority to do that.
  69.  
  70. So, you send it back.
  71.  
  72. If they then proceed, in the meantime when you have done that, you upload that instrument into your Court of Record in the Court of the Ekklesia.
  73.  
  74. It becomes part of the evidentiary record of your permanent record within your sanctuary protections and immunities within the Ecclesiastical Court under the Crown and His Majesty David Joel’s Sanctuary, Protection, and Immunities which is an obligation of contract that is inviolate worldwide.
  75.  
  76. It cannot be mitigated or in any way lessened. It is still honoring the Law.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on email

The Power of Acceptance

The Way You Do Equity Is You Accept Everything From Any Public Actor, Officer, Or Agent.

The one power inherent in every commercial
presentment is our unlimited Power to Accept.

If you accept it, you don’t go into controversy.
But you don’t “accept it for value”.
That’s a commercial aberration.

This is why the D’Vida documents, the Mandate and Writs, and instructions are created the way they are.

Here is a point-by-point explanation of how it works:

  1. If somebody comes to your door and says, “I’m here from the Health Department. You are required to take this injection . . . ”,
  2.  
  3. You say: “Great! I’m happy you are here.” With this attitude, you are not going into controversy and it defuses the entire situation.
  4.  
  5. You don’t argue. (Everybody thinks they need to argue and that’s where one enters a field of battle. The system is set up so that we lose every time in a field of battle because we go into dishonor, we dishonor the presentment. If you look at the rules of the UCC, you can only do 2 things: You can honor a presentment or you can dishonor it).
  6.  
  7. You don’t reject, you simply give them a condition, a precedent to your accepting the mandatory requirement.
  8.  
  9. What we tell people on the website and in the instructions is if someone comes to your door and says “it’s mandatory, you have to do it”, you say:
  10.  
  11. “Oh thank you for showing up. I appreciate it but I do not do any commercial business in person, only via the mail. I require your written authority with your wet ink signature and your supervisor’s wet ink signature sent to me in the mail.” If they say it is not a commercial business, you say “I am not here to argue the law with you. Are you qualified to make legal decisions here?” Of course they are not and will have to say so.
  12.  
  13. When it’s sent in the mail it’s under Federal jurisdiction. In the United States, if it’s a fraudulent instrument, the United States will deal with it on their own terms as mail fraud. In other countries it would be good to research to find similar basis for federal jurisdiction over anything that is sent through the mail.
  14.  
  15. Everything we do in the private aligns or conforms with the phrase “Let the Dead tend to the Dead.” Any item they send to you is a public document and a commercial instrument. It is from the realm of the dead. When we accept it and return it, we are sending their dead instrument back to them to settle.
  16.  
  17. So we let the Dead tend to the Dead, we let them settle their controversies, let them settle their claims, liabilities and so forth.
  18.  
  19. We stay in the private. We honor what they give us and we say to them, “We simply require it to come in a written form with your wet ink signature and that of your supervisor verifying your full legal and lawful authority to do what you say is mandatory.”
  20.  
  21. You don’t threaten. You only give honor and that requires them to return honor.
  22.  
  23. That is what is meant by “Going To Peace.” The power of going to peace is manifold beyond anything in the field of battle. They have to go back, put their wet ink signature on a written statement, and by so doing they’ve already put their liability on there – you don’t have to notice them of it. Sending Notices of Liability in any form is actually considered a threat and puts one in the position of being seen as a belligerent and enemy combatant. Doing what we do keeps us at peace in the public and neutral with all parties, thus not giving any manner of way to attack us.
  24.  
  25. If somebody comes to your door and you say, “Great, send me this, signed by you and your supervisor, please send it to this address, and the address is: Kingdom of David, Attention John Henry Doe, c/o 1234 Main Street, Sometown, Anystate…
  26.  
  27. They’re sending it to the Kingdom of David. You’re acting under the umbrella and sanctuary of the Kingdom of David.
  28.  
  29. What you do is you accept it, follow the instructions in your D’Vida Welcome Pack. Write in the upper right corner of the document “ACCEPTED” (with quotation marks), the date and your signature.
  30. You have actually accepted the embedded equity that underwrites the issue of that charged instrument that creates a debt. Even if you don’t think a mandate order to do something medically is neither commercial nor creates a debt, they do in fact do exactly that. When they do the injections they actually create a bond or multiple bonds, underwritten by your underlying estate, and they make a lot of money on the trading of these bonds. So, when they say  that is entirely not true. They are bonding us to further debt much more than the simple cost of the stuff shot into your arm.
  31.  
  32. When they have this mandate, they’re creating a charged instrument with the franchise name that compels you as the surety to step up under public policy and perform the mandatory requirement AKA, take the jab.
  33.  
  34. It is a charge just like any other charge. It has a monetary value. When you perform the duty, it becomes a discharge, which settles it. But the bonds underneath remain, and they are traded and generate a lot more than the charge on the surface.
  35.  
  36. There is equity there because the estate that underlies the franchise is providing the secured value and the collateralization of that debt instrument.
  37.  
  38. When you do full status correction, you have complete command and control of all of that. But it takes a serious commitment to fully correct one’s status.
  39.  
  40. What we are starting with our D’Vida members is that you can still have the power of acceptance even if you don’t have any status correction under your belt, because embedded in that instrument is equity. Intrinsic to any commercial instrument in the public is the Power to Accept. When you accept an instrument (document, presentment, bill, charge, order, mandate) you indicate that you have not abandoned the equity in the presentment.
  41.  
  42. When they present it in a written form with their signatures on it, it’s implicated that they’re standing under limited liability, plus they’re exceeding their bounds of duty or constraints of duty if there is no real authority that backs the mandate. They know (and we know) that that is the case. There is no authority behind these mandates.
  43.  
  44. When you accept it because it has your franchise name on it, you have taken control of the equity and you send it back to them.
  45.  
  46. When you send it back to them, it’s an implicit requirement that they must settle the account. If they settle the account, they stay within the bounds of their duty and there is no longer a charge or a means to apply the mandatory requirement on the US surety. If they do not do what is required, then they have exceeded the bounds of their authority and in this way, they have stepped out from behind the shield of limited liability that protects them only when they follow the law.
  47.  
  48. When you’re at the door with the man or woman who says, “You must do this”, say, “Fine, great, thank you for coming,” stay at peace.
  49.  
  50. “I would like you to present this in the form in which I do my commercial business.”
  51.  
  52. You can say it in different ways but that’s essentially what you are saying. You tell them to send it in writing, because that’s a commercial instrument because it has your franchise name on it, as the signature.
  53.  
  54. They are creating a bond which is a public form of monetary debt. It’s embedded with the equity.
  55.  
  56. They send it in the mail and when you’ve told them at the door, “Send it to me this way, and I will honor it to the full extent of the law”, they’re thinking “Oh, the full extent of the law, the law says you must mandatorily take the jab.” But that’s not the law. What is in the law is your power of acceptance and everything that has been written above. The key is “I will honor it”, because we always want to stay in honor with the public, in commerce.
  57.  
  58. So, you get this charged instrument and you accept it and return it to them.
  59.  
  60. That is an implied command that they must settle the charged instrument and zero it out by generally accepted economics principles of debits and credits.
  61.  
  62. Credit is on the private side even though you don’t have standing to claim it.
  63.  
  64. It is implied in the instrument that it is able to be accepted to discharge.
  65.  
  66. This is because the law says the power of acceptance is apparent in every instrument that it is able to be accepted to discharge.
  67.  
  68. The law says the power of acceptance is apparent in every instrument and in every presentment. Not “accepted for value” because that is turning it into a negotiable instrument and you don’t have the authority to do that.
  69.  
  70. So, you send it back.
  71.  
  72. If they then proceed, in the meantime when you have done that, you upload that instrument into your Court of Record in the Court of the Ekklesia.
  73.  
  74. It becomes part of the evidentiary record of your permanent record within your sanctuary protections and immunities within the Ecclesiastical Court under the Crown and His Majesty David Joel’s Sanctuary, Protection, and Immunities which is an obligation of contract that is inviolate worldwide.
  75.  
  76. It cannot be mitigated or in any way lessened. It is still honoring the Law.

Related Posts

Transforming our world to leave a legacy of Peace and Prosperity for the future.